Post by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger on Nov 16, 2006 1:57:58 GMT -5
Part II:
Copyright © 2009 Dr. Hildegarde Staninger, RIET-1
Industrial Toxicologist/IH,
Doctor of Integrative Medicine
Integrative Health Systems, LLC
415 3/4th N. Larchmont Blvd.,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
Tel: 323-466-2599 Fax: 323-466-2774
www.staningerreport.com
www.1cellonelight.com/store
PROTECTING YOURSELF FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS IN THE HOME, WORKPLACE and ENVIRONMENT
( Continued from Part I: drhildy.proboards46.com/index.cgi?board=emf&action=display&thread=1163660161 )
OSHA General Industry Standard 1910.97 & 1010.98 for
Nonionizaton Radiation.
The 1910.97 and 1910.98 OSHA General Industry Standard specifically addresses employee whole body radiation employee exposure in which the entire body is exposed to the incident electromagnetic energy (ELF – extremely low frequency noise) or in which the cross section of the body is smaller than the cross section of the incident radiation beam. The identification of problem areas in the workplace, using direct reading equipment to detect the ELF’s is hard to do, because of the ELF and EMF fluctuations and a standard that addresses peak 10 minute exposures only.
The OSHA standard recommends nonionizaton exposure levels to extremely low frequencies to be within the range of 10 MHz to 100 GHz with a radiation protection guide as 10 mW/cm2 (milliwatt per square centimeter) averaged over any possible 0.1 hour period. In other words, this means the following: Power Density: 10 mW/cm2 for periods of 0.1 hour or more (I.e. 10 minutes or more), Energy Density: 1 mWhr/cm2 (milliwatt hour per square centimeter) during any 0.1 hour period (10 minute period).
If you have reached this level during any 8-hour workplace shift during any 10- minute time increment, you have been overexposed. Furthermore, these ranges do not address ELF levels below 10 Hz which have been associated with male testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand held speed monitoring devices (guns).
Funded R & D Programs
The Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) and DOE have the largest, long-established R & D efforts on the biological effects of EMF. The DOD, FDA and EPA have smaller, mission – related programs. EPA, NIST, FDA and NIOSH are expanding their EMF health effects R & D programs.
In 1990 Congress asked that FRA, under the Railroad Research and Development Program, investigate the health effects of magnetic fields associated with maglev technologies, starting with a commitment of $500,000 per year. From 1990-92, $1.84 million has been allocated to R & D on EMF characterization, source analysis and mitigation. Twelve reports were published characterizing the EMF environment for electric rail and transit systems, compared to with advanced high speed rail and maglev technologies.
FRA, through the Volpe Center, has initiated and supported multi-year R & D programs by EPA, DOE/ANL and contractors (ERM) to characterize and assess EMF environments for existing and proposed advanced rail systems including maglev, high-speed rail, and North-East Corridor (NEC), and selected transit systems. The scientific literature on health effects relevant to rail and maglev EMF issues as part of environmental review and impact assessments for rail electrification (North East Corridor) or proposed new developments (Texas TGV, Orlando maglev).
The NAS/ NRC Transportation Research Board (TRB) has maintained an active interest in this topic which has been discussed at Safety Workshops, TRB Annual Meetings and its Safety Oversight Board sessions. TRB Circular No. 432 (July 1994) outlines EMF Effects and Research needs for High Speed Rail.
OTA studied the EMF issue, when comparing maglev and high-speed rail safety aspects, at the request of the House Appropriations Committee. OTA has visited Volpe Center for data gathering on EMF’s and included it in its 1991 report on maglev feasibility. OSTP has also compiled a 1992 directory of federal R & D on EMF;s, solicited and included Volpe Center inputs on FRA and USCG programs. National EMF RAPID publications on its research agenda and communication plans include DOT.
Radio-Frequency Radiation Health and Environmental Impacts
A similar problem is presented by the uncertainties regarding adverse health effects from radio and microwave radiation associated with diverse transportation navigation, communications and traffic control installations (e.g., USCG long-range navigation systems, FAA surveillance, and weather radars and microwave landing systems). The fear of cancer from use of cellular phones and microwave ovens extends to FAA radar towers and to IVHS active devices for collision avoidance (radars and infrared lasers).
Although there were draft regulations proposed by both EPA and OSHA in 1986, no federal safety guidelines or regulations exist for exposure to radio frequency through microwave radiation (3 KHz to 300 GHz). There are interim World Health Organization Criteria 137 (1993), trade association guidelines for occupational exposure safety (ACGIH, 1993-94) and the IEEE/ANSI 1991 Standards for public and occupational exposure safety. The FCC has proposed to adopt the latter, but its reconsidering in light of numerous public and agency objections. While there are numerous new wireless communication technologies, devices and applications at increasingly higher and multiple frequencies, research on health effects is scant. There is some evidence that sensitive or vulnerable population segments to RFR and microwave radiation exist (e.g. pacemaker wearers, users of electrical chairs, people who cannot dissipate heat normally or those who take glaucoma medication).
The CIRRPC Science sub-panel on EMF Health Effects, of which DOT is a member is preparing a compendium of existing RFR exposure safety guidelines, with a discussion of their rationale and applicability. DOT modes (FHWA, NHTSA, FRA, FAA) are also actively engaged in R & D to support policy and deployment decisions, in the absence of federal guidelines.
Protecting Yourself from EMF and ELF
One can see that over the last decade and a half, there has not been one federal regulation or guideline to protect workers or the public for the hazardous emissions of EMF’s and ELF’s. During this time frame, additional cell phone towers and communities have grown with more housing, thus more electrical needs for the community. The question is simple: how do we protect ourselves from EMF’s and ELF’s that will grow to higher numbers each day due to its use in many new weapons for military, space and riot control. Some examples are: electronic, psychotronic, information weaponry, high altitude ultra low-frequency weapons, plasma, electromagnetic, sonic and ultrasonic weapons, laser weapons, strategic, theater, tactical or extraterrestrial weapons, environmental climatic and tectonic weapons. The ringing in your ears may not be Minears disease, but may be the hum of ELF’s from nearby cell phone towers which are geared, not only to supply cell phones, but to aid governments in controlled experiments involving various frequency ranges to control the community.9
During the last 20 years, the Teslar watch has been used to protect one from EMF’s and ELF’s. In space, astronauts are cramped into small quarters with heavy electronic equipment and frequently have suffered form “space sickness”, which provide natural Earth energy were added to the space capsule. On earth, scientific studies have shown people working and living around electricity are developing cancer faster than non-electrical workers; speed guns are suspected of contributing to the high rate of police testicular cancer; computers and water bed users have an 80% higher rate of miscarriage, and cellular phones are suspected of providing a frequency environment supporting the growth of brain tumors.
In the 1980’s, a medical doctor named Andrija Puharich discovered a method to shield humans from the harmful effects of electricity. He placed the invention into a bracelet that was then developed into a watch by Ilonka Harezi, who called it “Teslar.” The benefit of wearing the Teslar is that it shields the wearer against harmful effects of electricity produced by appliances, toasters, clocks, cellular phones, TV’s, computers, etc. Wearing the Teslar lets you go into shopping centers, use computers, work around electronic equipment, travel through time zones, while reducing many of the ill effects linked to the harmful side of electricity. Some effects are migraines, allergies, eye strain, arthritic and joint pain, tiredness, PMS, emotional highs and lows, general uneasiness, and many others.
It is the responsibility under OSHA’s General Industry Standards to protect the worker from exposure to ELF’s. The Teslar watch would be an ideal personal protective device that is economically cost effective for an employee, since there is only one engineering control present, which is the removal of the employee from exposure during specific intervals of time.
The watch generates a protective zero point energy field (i.e. scalar wave), which enables the wearer to reduce the risk of exposure to electromagnetic fields in the workplace as he performs his everyday duties within the workplace without any restrictions to his mobility and ion hazard analysis/function.
The Teslar technology was applied to the Philip Stein watch in 2003, which became the first environmental functional watch during this decade, imbuing a personal protective device for even the singer Madonna and Oprah Winfrey.10
In the 1990’s, Mr. Ra of Zeropa, Inc., Seoul, Korea, developed the Zerofon in the shape of a lady bug to protect cordless phone users from EMF’s. The Zerofon consists of a combination of absorptive and conductive material which forms a molecular structure with a high plasticity yield temperature of above 1,600 degrees C. This material absorbs the emissions of the long electromagnetic waves, part of which are extinguished and part of which are modified and radiated as 2.5 um – 25 um original infrared rays which represent a source of useful bionic energy for the human body. The quantity of irradiated energy is equal to the quantity of energy absorbed.
Zerofon is a semi-permanent product which repeats resonance. Just as radiated infrared rays facilitate animal and plant growth and blood circulation, Zerofon neutralizes the potential risk to the human body, activates the bodies’ bionics and absorbs harmful electromagnetic fields by approximately 59% as stated by the SAR test (Specific Absorption Rate) as administered by the University of Utah on the Zerofon. Zerofon is ideal to place on cordless phones, cell phones, walkie talkies,and larger Zircom are used on refrigerators, computers and television sets.11
Scientists at Dearborn Technologies have developed devices called Excellospheres which create a vortex in water, which then creates a vortex in the cells of individuals who drink the water. The water creates a super radiance reaction within the molecules of the water, which repeals the vibrational effect upon the water from EMF and ELF emissions. Dr. Masuru Emoto of Japan showed these vibrational effects from water exposed to a cell phone’s EMF. The crystal formed was totally deformed and not the true hexagonal form of a crystal.12,13
Advanced testing of this water with Micro Raman testing showed that the water molecule showed life in it, as compared to a biologically active water that had cells generating a fluorescence.14 Continued drinking of this water hydrates the cells so that vibrational changes in water molecules do not affect the cellular structure or bioactivity as seen in cells exposed to EMF’s or ELF’s.
Conclusion
In the1970’s, the EPA and OSHA agencies were formed to protect our environment and workplace from disease and pollution. These same agencies have studied the aspects of studying EMF’s, ELF’s and Radio Frequency Radiation for over 15 years. To this date, no definitive guideline, federal regulation or general standard has been developed to aid a worker or home owner in protecting themselves from the harmful effects of EMF’s, which may be a simple explanation that none of the environmental professionals have realized. A governmental agency cannot make a regulation, when its public is being tested by interagency programs of R & D under the auspices of National Security.
REFERENCES
1. Bierbaum, M.E., Philip J. and John M. Peters, M.D., Sc.D. Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop on the Health Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields on Workers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIOSH, Cincinnati, Ohio. © January 30-31, 1991.
2. Sacarello, Ph.D, Hildegarde and Scott Evans. Genetic Cancer Assessment of Electrophilic Hydrocarbon Mixtures Found in Sub-Surface Water Supplies. Symposium on Short-Term Genetic bioassays in the evaluation of complex Environmental Mixtures. U.S. EPA Genetic Toxicology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
© March 27-29, 1984.
3. Kaune, W.T. Coupling of living organisms to ELF electric and magnetic fields. Found within: Biological and human health effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Arlington, VA. American Institute of Biological Sciences, pgs 25-60. © 1985.
4. Brecher, Aviva. U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration. A White Paper on the Health Effects from EMFs and RFR Associated with Transportation Systems: An Emerging Cross-Modal Issue. DOT/RSPA, VOLPE Cneter/DTS-24 © May 2006.
5. Juutilainen J. Pukkala E, and E. Laara. Results of epidemiological cancer study among electrical workers in Finland. Journal of Bioelectricity 7: 119-121,
© 1988.
6. Sikov, M.R., Rommereim, D.N., Beamer, J.L., Buschborn, R.L., Kaune, W.t., and R.D. Phillips. Devleopmental studies of Hanford miniature swine exposed to 60 Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 8:229-242. © 1987.
7. Heat shock effects compared to EMF/EMR exposures. www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/nonthermal.pdf
8. Tenforde, T.S. and W.T. Kaune. Interaction of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with humans. Health Phys. 53: 585-606. © 1987.
9. Ronson, Jon. The Men Who Stare at Goats. Simon & Schuster. New York, New York. © 2004
10. Oprah Winfrey Show. Christmas Special Items. Philip Stein, Miami, Florida © November 2003. www.philipstein.com
11. Zerofon. Zeropa, Seoul, Korea www.zeropa.com
12. Staninger, Ph.D., Hildegarde. Excellospheres Private R & D projects for Dearborn Technologies. Integrative Health International, Lakewood, CA. (under Yamato Shinjo). © October 2006.
13. Emoto, Masaru. The True Power of Water: Healing and Discovering Ourselves. Beyond Words Publishing, Hillsboro, Oregon. © 2005.
14. Staninger, Hildegarde. Yamato Shinjo: Phase I Chemical Analysis and Micro Raman Tests for Excellospheres, Japan. IHI, LLC, Lakewood, CA. © October 2006
TABLE 1-1: Average magnetic field exposures for various types of workers (in milligauss)*. Taken from NIOSH Fact Sheet: EMF’s in the Workplace. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-129.
Average daily exposures
Type of Worker Median+ Range
Workers on the job:
Clerical workers without computers 0.5 0.2 – 2.0
Clerical workers with computers 1.2 0.5 – 4.5
Machinists 1.9 0.6 – 27.6
Electric line workers 2.5 0.5 – 34.8
Electricans 5.4 0.8 – 34.0
Welders 8.2 1.7 – 96.0
Workers off the job
(home, travel, etc.) 0.9 0.3 – 3.7
* Magnetic fields are often measured in gauss or milligauss (one thousandth of a gauss = 1 milligauss).
+ The median is the middle measurement: 1/2 the workers have average daily exposures above this point and 1/2 below.
Copyright © 2009 Dr. Hildegarde Staninger, RIET-1
Industrial Toxicologist/IH,
Doctor of Integrative Medicine
Integrative Health Systems, LLC
415 3/4th N. Larchmont Blvd.,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
Tel: 323-466-2599 Fax: 323-466-2774
www.staningerreport.com
www.1cellonelight.com/store
PROTECTING YOURSELF FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS IN THE HOME, WORKPLACE and ENVIRONMENT
( Continued from Part I: drhildy.proboards46.com/index.cgi?board=emf&action=display&thread=1163660161 )
OSHA General Industry Standard 1910.97 & 1010.98 for
Nonionizaton Radiation.
The 1910.97 and 1910.98 OSHA General Industry Standard specifically addresses employee whole body radiation employee exposure in which the entire body is exposed to the incident electromagnetic energy (ELF – extremely low frequency noise) or in which the cross section of the body is smaller than the cross section of the incident radiation beam. The identification of problem areas in the workplace, using direct reading equipment to detect the ELF’s is hard to do, because of the ELF and EMF fluctuations and a standard that addresses peak 10 minute exposures only.
The OSHA standard recommends nonionizaton exposure levels to extremely low frequencies to be within the range of 10 MHz to 100 GHz with a radiation protection guide as 10 mW/cm2 (milliwatt per square centimeter) averaged over any possible 0.1 hour period. In other words, this means the following: Power Density: 10 mW/cm2 for periods of 0.1 hour or more (I.e. 10 minutes or more), Energy Density: 1 mWhr/cm2 (milliwatt hour per square centimeter) during any 0.1 hour period (10 minute period).
If you have reached this level during any 8-hour workplace shift during any 10- minute time increment, you have been overexposed. Furthermore, these ranges do not address ELF levels below 10 Hz which have been associated with male testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand held speed monitoring devices (guns).
Funded R & D Programs
The Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) and DOE have the largest, long-established R & D efforts on the biological effects of EMF. The DOD, FDA and EPA have smaller, mission – related programs. EPA, NIST, FDA and NIOSH are expanding their EMF health effects R & D programs.
In 1990 Congress asked that FRA, under the Railroad Research and Development Program, investigate the health effects of magnetic fields associated with maglev technologies, starting with a commitment of $500,000 per year. From 1990-92, $1.84 million has been allocated to R & D on EMF characterization, source analysis and mitigation. Twelve reports were published characterizing the EMF environment for electric rail and transit systems, compared to with advanced high speed rail and maglev technologies.
FRA, through the Volpe Center, has initiated and supported multi-year R & D programs by EPA, DOE/ANL and contractors (ERM) to characterize and assess EMF environments for existing and proposed advanced rail systems including maglev, high-speed rail, and North-East Corridor (NEC), and selected transit systems. The scientific literature on health effects relevant to rail and maglev EMF issues as part of environmental review and impact assessments for rail electrification (North East Corridor) or proposed new developments (Texas TGV, Orlando maglev).
The NAS/ NRC Transportation Research Board (TRB) has maintained an active interest in this topic which has been discussed at Safety Workshops, TRB Annual Meetings and its Safety Oversight Board sessions. TRB Circular No. 432 (July 1994) outlines EMF Effects and Research needs for High Speed Rail.
OTA studied the EMF issue, when comparing maglev and high-speed rail safety aspects, at the request of the House Appropriations Committee. OTA has visited Volpe Center for data gathering on EMF’s and included it in its 1991 report on maglev feasibility. OSTP has also compiled a 1992 directory of federal R & D on EMF;s, solicited and included Volpe Center inputs on FRA and USCG programs. National EMF RAPID publications on its research agenda and communication plans include DOT.
Radio-Frequency Radiation Health and Environmental Impacts
A similar problem is presented by the uncertainties regarding adverse health effects from radio and microwave radiation associated with diverse transportation navigation, communications and traffic control installations (e.g., USCG long-range navigation systems, FAA surveillance, and weather radars and microwave landing systems). The fear of cancer from use of cellular phones and microwave ovens extends to FAA radar towers and to IVHS active devices for collision avoidance (radars and infrared lasers).
Although there were draft regulations proposed by both EPA and OSHA in 1986, no federal safety guidelines or regulations exist for exposure to radio frequency through microwave radiation (3 KHz to 300 GHz). There are interim World Health Organization Criteria 137 (1993), trade association guidelines for occupational exposure safety (ACGIH, 1993-94) and the IEEE/ANSI 1991 Standards for public and occupational exposure safety. The FCC has proposed to adopt the latter, but its reconsidering in light of numerous public and agency objections. While there are numerous new wireless communication technologies, devices and applications at increasingly higher and multiple frequencies, research on health effects is scant. There is some evidence that sensitive or vulnerable population segments to RFR and microwave radiation exist (e.g. pacemaker wearers, users of electrical chairs, people who cannot dissipate heat normally or those who take glaucoma medication).
The CIRRPC Science sub-panel on EMF Health Effects, of which DOT is a member is preparing a compendium of existing RFR exposure safety guidelines, with a discussion of their rationale and applicability. DOT modes (FHWA, NHTSA, FRA, FAA) are also actively engaged in R & D to support policy and deployment decisions, in the absence of federal guidelines.
Protecting Yourself from EMF and ELF
One can see that over the last decade and a half, there has not been one federal regulation or guideline to protect workers or the public for the hazardous emissions of EMF’s and ELF’s. During this time frame, additional cell phone towers and communities have grown with more housing, thus more electrical needs for the community. The question is simple: how do we protect ourselves from EMF’s and ELF’s that will grow to higher numbers each day due to its use in many new weapons for military, space and riot control. Some examples are: electronic, psychotronic, information weaponry, high altitude ultra low-frequency weapons, plasma, electromagnetic, sonic and ultrasonic weapons, laser weapons, strategic, theater, tactical or extraterrestrial weapons, environmental climatic and tectonic weapons. The ringing in your ears may not be Minears disease, but may be the hum of ELF’s from nearby cell phone towers which are geared, not only to supply cell phones, but to aid governments in controlled experiments involving various frequency ranges to control the community.9
During the last 20 years, the Teslar watch has been used to protect one from EMF’s and ELF’s. In space, astronauts are cramped into small quarters with heavy electronic equipment and frequently have suffered form “space sickness”, which provide natural Earth energy were added to the space capsule. On earth, scientific studies have shown people working and living around electricity are developing cancer faster than non-electrical workers; speed guns are suspected of contributing to the high rate of police testicular cancer; computers and water bed users have an 80% higher rate of miscarriage, and cellular phones are suspected of providing a frequency environment supporting the growth of brain tumors.
In the 1980’s, a medical doctor named Andrija Puharich discovered a method to shield humans from the harmful effects of electricity. He placed the invention into a bracelet that was then developed into a watch by Ilonka Harezi, who called it “Teslar.” The benefit of wearing the Teslar is that it shields the wearer against harmful effects of electricity produced by appliances, toasters, clocks, cellular phones, TV’s, computers, etc. Wearing the Teslar lets you go into shopping centers, use computers, work around electronic equipment, travel through time zones, while reducing many of the ill effects linked to the harmful side of electricity. Some effects are migraines, allergies, eye strain, arthritic and joint pain, tiredness, PMS, emotional highs and lows, general uneasiness, and many others.
It is the responsibility under OSHA’s General Industry Standards to protect the worker from exposure to ELF’s. The Teslar watch would be an ideal personal protective device that is economically cost effective for an employee, since there is only one engineering control present, which is the removal of the employee from exposure during specific intervals of time.
The watch generates a protective zero point energy field (i.e. scalar wave), which enables the wearer to reduce the risk of exposure to electromagnetic fields in the workplace as he performs his everyday duties within the workplace without any restrictions to his mobility and ion hazard analysis/function.
The Teslar technology was applied to the Philip Stein watch in 2003, which became the first environmental functional watch during this decade, imbuing a personal protective device for even the singer Madonna and Oprah Winfrey.10
In the 1990’s, Mr. Ra of Zeropa, Inc., Seoul, Korea, developed the Zerofon in the shape of a lady bug to protect cordless phone users from EMF’s. The Zerofon consists of a combination of absorptive and conductive material which forms a molecular structure with a high plasticity yield temperature of above 1,600 degrees C. This material absorbs the emissions of the long electromagnetic waves, part of which are extinguished and part of which are modified and radiated as 2.5 um – 25 um original infrared rays which represent a source of useful bionic energy for the human body. The quantity of irradiated energy is equal to the quantity of energy absorbed.
Zerofon is a semi-permanent product which repeats resonance. Just as radiated infrared rays facilitate animal and plant growth and blood circulation, Zerofon neutralizes the potential risk to the human body, activates the bodies’ bionics and absorbs harmful electromagnetic fields by approximately 59% as stated by the SAR test (Specific Absorption Rate) as administered by the University of Utah on the Zerofon. Zerofon is ideal to place on cordless phones, cell phones, walkie talkies,and larger Zircom are used on refrigerators, computers and television sets.11
Scientists at Dearborn Technologies have developed devices called Excellospheres which create a vortex in water, which then creates a vortex in the cells of individuals who drink the water. The water creates a super radiance reaction within the molecules of the water, which repeals the vibrational effect upon the water from EMF and ELF emissions. Dr. Masuru Emoto of Japan showed these vibrational effects from water exposed to a cell phone’s EMF. The crystal formed was totally deformed and not the true hexagonal form of a crystal.12,13
Advanced testing of this water with Micro Raman testing showed that the water molecule showed life in it, as compared to a biologically active water that had cells generating a fluorescence.14 Continued drinking of this water hydrates the cells so that vibrational changes in water molecules do not affect the cellular structure or bioactivity as seen in cells exposed to EMF’s or ELF’s.
Conclusion
In the1970’s, the EPA and OSHA agencies were formed to protect our environment and workplace from disease and pollution. These same agencies have studied the aspects of studying EMF’s, ELF’s and Radio Frequency Radiation for over 15 years. To this date, no definitive guideline, federal regulation or general standard has been developed to aid a worker or home owner in protecting themselves from the harmful effects of EMF’s, which may be a simple explanation that none of the environmental professionals have realized. A governmental agency cannot make a regulation, when its public is being tested by interagency programs of R & D under the auspices of National Security.
REFERENCES
1. Bierbaum, M.E., Philip J. and John M. Peters, M.D., Sc.D. Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop on the Health Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields on Workers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIOSH, Cincinnati, Ohio. © January 30-31, 1991.
2. Sacarello, Ph.D, Hildegarde and Scott Evans. Genetic Cancer Assessment of Electrophilic Hydrocarbon Mixtures Found in Sub-Surface Water Supplies. Symposium on Short-Term Genetic bioassays in the evaluation of complex Environmental Mixtures. U.S. EPA Genetic Toxicology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
© March 27-29, 1984.
3. Kaune, W.T. Coupling of living organisms to ELF electric and magnetic fields. Found within: Biological and human health effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Arlington, VA. American Institute of Biological Sciences, pgs 25-60. © 1985.
4. Brecher, Aviva. U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration. A White Paper on the Health Effects from EMFs and RFR Associated with Transportation Systems: An Emerging Cross-Modal Issue. DOT/RSPA, VOLPE Cneter/DTS-24 © May 2006.
5. Juutilainen J. Pukkala E, and E. Laara. Results of epidemiological cancer study among electrical workers in Finland. Journal of Bioelectricity 7: 119-121,
© 1988.
6. Sikov, M.R., Rommereim, D.N., Beamer, J.L., Buschborn, R.L., Kaune, W.t., and R.D. Phillips. Devleopmental studies of Hanford miniature swine exposed to 60 Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 8:229-242. © 1987.
7. Heat shock effects compared to EMF/EMR exposures. www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/nonthermal.pdf
8. Tenforde, T.S. and W.T. Kaune. Interaction of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with humans. Health Phys. 53: 585-606. © 1987.
9. Ronson, Jon. The Men Who Stare at Goats. Simon & Schuster. New York, New York. © 2004
10. Oprah Winfrey Show. Christmas Special Items. Philip Stein, Miami, Florida © November 2003. www.philipstein.com
11. Zerofon. Zeropa, Seoul, Korea www.zeropa.com
12. Staninger, Ph.D., Hildegarde. Excellospheres Private R & D projects for Dearborn Technologies. Integrative Health International, Lakewood, CA. (under Yamato Shinjo). © October 2006.
13. Emoto, Masaru. The True Power of Water: Healing and Discovering Ourselves. Beyond Words Publishing, Hillsboro, Oregon. © 2005.
14. Staninger, Hildegarde. Yamato Shinjo: Phase I Chemical Analysis and Micro Raman Tests for Excellospheres, Japan. IHI, LLC, Lakewood, CA. © October 2006
TABLE 1-1: Average magnetic field exposures for various types of workers (in milligauss)*. Taken from NIOSH Fact Sheet: EMF’s in the Workplace. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-129.
Average daily exposures
Type of Worker Median+ Range
Workers on the job:
Clerical workers without computers 0.5 0.2 – 2.0
Clerical workers with computers 1.2 0.5 – 4.5
Machinists 1.9 0.6 – 27.6
Electric line workers 2.5 0.5 – 34.8
Electricans 5.4 0.8 – 34.0
Welders 8.2 1.7 – 96.0
Workers off the job
(home, travel, etc.) 0.9 0.3 – 3.7
* Magnetic fields are often measured in gauss or milligauss (one thousandth of a gauss = 1 milligauss).
+ The median is the middle measurement: 1/2 the workers have average daily exposures above this point and 1/2 below.